Cancer Treatment Reviews
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Pages 187-197, August 1999

Primary chemotherapy or hormonotherapy for patients with breast cancer

  • Etienne G.C. Brain

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre René Huguenin, 35, rue Dailly, Saint-Cloud, 92210, France
  • ,
  • Jean-Louis Misset

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Oncology, Paul Brousse Hospital, 14, avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, Villejuif, 94800, France
  • ,
  • Jacques Rouëssé

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre René Huguenin, 35, rue Dailly, Saint-Cloud, 92210, France

Abstract 

Scientific rationale for primary treatment of breast cancer relies on experimental data showing that the incidence and growth of disease correlate with the primary tumour mass and tumoral anglogenesis. Although the strategy may be applied to both chemotherapy and hormonotherapy, only the first was extensively explored for patients with locally advanced breast cancer in order to improve survival and to avoid mastectomy through the achievement of a downstaging of the tumour. Encouraging results obtained in this clinically advanced setting combined with renewed interest for tumoral anglogenesis brought clinicians to apply this strategy to smaller tumours. Despite high clinical and radiological response rates, only pathologic information, carefully assessed in both the primary and axillae lymph nodes, stands out as the major source of prognostic information on patients’ outcome. Recent developments in chemotherapy (dose-intensity, new drugs) do not seem to influence these results, indicating the possible limitations of recent developments in chemotherapy. Of 6 published randomized trials comparing primaryvs adjuvant chemotherapy, none showed any significant impact of primary chemotherapy on survival, with a trend towards delayed/less distant recurrences in patients treated by primary chemotherapy in some. Some recent reports suggest that local relapse rate might be increased after conservative treatment following induction chemotherapy in subgroups analyse and this should cause oncologists to revise and define the role for conservative surgery after primary medical treatment without calling into question the global strategy. Through sequential samplings, neoadjuvant medical treatment provides indeed the opportunity (a) to identify molecular mechanisms associated with pathologic response and (b) to study the possibility to guide the choices for induction treatment and patient populations submitted to primary medical treatment.

Keywords: Primary medical treatment, chemotherapy, hormonotherapy, breast cancer

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Corresponding author: Etienne GC Brain, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre René Huguenin, 35, rue Dailly, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France, Tel +33 1 47 11 15 15 Fax +33 1 47 11 16 29 E-mail ecg_brain@yahoo.com

PII: S0305-7372(98)90118-9

doi:10.1053/ctrv.1998.0118

Cancer Treatment Reviews
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Pages 187-197, August 1999