Cancer Treatment Reviews
Volume 37, Issue 2 , Pages 89-96, April 2011

Adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: Evidence and analysis

  • Ann Raldow

      Affiliations

    • Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
  • ,
  • Daniel A. Hamstra

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
  • ,
  • Sung N. Kim

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, NJ, United States
    • Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
    • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
  • ,
  • James B. Yu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 2037855703.

Received 6 April 2010; received in revised form 28 June 2010; accepted 4 July 2010. published online 28 July 2010.

Abstract 

Although surgery provides excellent control for localized prostate cancer, pathologic examination of more than one-third of specimens will reveal positive surgical margins, seminal vesicle invasion, and/or extracapsular extension, thus putting these patients at increased risk of cancer recurrence. “Adjuvant” radiotherapy (ART) refers to treatment of patients with an undetectable PSA that is delivered after surgery (usually less than 12–16weeks from the time of surgery). Currently, there are no standardized guidelines for the use of ART and the bulk of patients are solely monitored for signs of recurrence after prostatectomy. In this article, we review the evidence for ART from three randomized clinical trials. Although radiation therapy in the adjuvant setting has generally been well tolerated, we also examine the complication data associated with treatment. In addition, we discuss the technical aspects of treatment, including dose escalation and treatment target volume. The ability to increase dose and limit target volume would likely result in higher cure rates and decreased side effects, thus ensuring a better clinical outcome and increasing quality of life. Finally, we discuss the cost-effectiveness of ART, in the context of other medical interventions.

Keywords: Prostate cancer, Radiation therapy, Adjuvant radiation therapy, Post-operative radiation therapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0305-7372(10)00109-X

doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.07.001

Cancer Treatment Reviews
Volume 37, Issue 2 , Pages 89-96, April 2011