« Previous
Next »
Cancer Treatment Reviews
Volume 36, Issue 1
, Pages 69-74
, February 2010
Overall survival benefit for weekly vs. three-weekly taxanes regimens in advanced breast cancer: A meta-analysis
References
- . Multiple treatments meta-analysis of chemotherapy and targeted therapies in advanced breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(24):1780–1791
- Phase II study of weekly docetaxel and trastuzumab for patients with HER-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1800–1808
- Phase I trial of docetaxel administered by weekly infusion in patients with advanced refractory cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2164–2168
- Phase I study of docetaxel administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion on a weekly basis. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:1458–1467
- Docetaxel administered on a weekly basis for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1212–1219
- . Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007;8:16
- . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–188Sep
- . The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10:101–129
- . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–1558
- . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560
- Phase 3 study comparing the use of docetaxel on an every-3-week versus weekly schedule in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Cancer. 2008;112(7):1455–1461
- A multicentre, randomised phase II study of weekly or 3-weekly docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004;15(9):1358–1365
- Randomized phase III trial of weekly compared with every-3-weeks paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer, with trastuzumab for all HER-2 overexpressors and random assignment to trastuzumab or not in HER-2 nonoverexpressors: final results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 9840. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(10):1642–1649
- A randomized phase III study comparing three anthracycline-free taxane-based regimens, as first line chemotherapy, in metastatic breast cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;115(1):87–99
- Weekly cisplatin, epirubicin, and paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support vs triweekly epirubicin and paclitaxel in locally advanced breast cancer: final analysis of a sicog phase III study. Br J Cancer. 2006;95(8):1005–1012
- Gemcitabine and split-dose paclitaxel or docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer: a randomised phase II study. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(12):1797–1806
- . Weekly docetaxel vs every 3-week in advanced breast cancer: results of a pilot comparative study. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2002;21:[abstr 2013]
- Randomized clinical comparison of weekly or every-3-week 130-nanometer albumin-bound paclitaxel vs. every-3-week docetaxel as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2007;5(Suppl. 4):215;abstr P#2106
- Weekly cisplatin–epirubicin–paclitaxel with G-CSF support (PET) vs. triweekly epirubicin–paclitaxel (ET) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(16S, June 1 Suppl.):580
- Multicenter, 3-arm randomized study of high-dose weekly paclitaxel (HDWP) versus standard-dose weekly paclitaxel (SDWP) for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2002;21:[abstr 134]
- A phase III study on the efficacy and safety of docetaxel, every three weeks or as a weekly regimen in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;106(Suppl. 1):S70;[abstract 1083]
- Significantly longer progression-free survival with nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(22):3611–3619
- . Progression-free survival and time to progression as primary end points in advanced breast cancer: often used, sometimes loosely defined. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(3):460–464
- . To IPD or not to IPD? Advantages and disadvantages of systematic reviews using individual patient data. Eval Health Prof. 2002;25:76–97
- . Individual patient data metanalysis in cancer. Br J Cancer. 1998;77:2036–2044
- . Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough. Lancet. 1998;351:123–127
PII: S0305-7372(09)00159-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.10.006
© 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Cancer Treatment Reviews
Volume 36, Issue 1
, Pages 69-74
, February 2010
