Cancer Treatment Reviews
Volume 36, Issue 1 , Pages 24-32, February 2010

Second-line treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma

  • Giovanni Luca Ceresoli

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Istituto Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
    • Department of Oncology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, via A. Manzoni 59, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Oncology, Istituto Humanitas Gavazzeni, via M. Gavazzeni 21, 24125 Bergamo, Italy. Tel.: +39 035 4204 663; fax: +39 035 4204 303.
  • ,
  • Paolo Andrea Zucali

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, via A. Manzoni 59, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
    • Tel.: +39 02 8224 4080; fax: +39 02 8224 4090.
  • ,
  • Letizia Gianoncelli

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, via A. Manzoni 59, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
    • Tel.: +39 02 8224 4080; fax: +39 02 8224 4090.
  • ,
  • Elena Lorenzi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, via A. Manzoni 59, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
    • Tel.: +39 02 8224 4080; fax: +39 02 8224 4090.
  • ,
  • Armando Santoro

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, via A. Manzoni 59, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
    • Tel.: +39 02 8224 4080; fax: +39 02 8224 4090.

Received 6 May 2009; received in revised form 23 September 2009; accepted 25 September 2009. published online 30 October 2009.

Summary 

Most patients affected by malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) are candidates for chemotherapy during the course of the disease, as single modality treatment or within the context of a multimodality approach. Following the results of a large phase III trial, the combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed has become the preferred first-line chemotherapy, although there is also evidence for the activity of the combination with carboplatin based on phase II studies. Unfortunately, nearly all MPM patients progress during or after first-line treatment. Second-line therapies are being increasingly used in the clinical practice because patients are frequently still healthy at the time of disease progression. However, the role of these treatments in MPM is unproven, and the optimal regimens still remain to be defined.

In pemetrexed-naïve patients, data from a randomized trial vs. best supportive care suggest the use of single-agent pemetrexed as a standard second-line treatment. This evidence is supported also by the results of the Expanded Access Programs. To date, there is still no standard approach for the growing population of pemetrexed-pre-treated patients. In selected cases with a prolonged response to first-line pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, re-treatment with a pemetrexed-based regimen should be considered. When a trial is not available or patients are not eligible for an experimental approach, single-agent vinorelbine can be a reasonable option for palliation. However, second-line therapy in MPM remains an ideal field in which to test new chemotherapy agents as well as new therapeutic strategies, including anti-angiogenic compounds, small molecules or monoclonal antibodies that target different molecular pathways.

Keywords: Mesothelioma, Second-line therapy, Chemotherapy, Targeted therapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0305-7372(09)00141-8

doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.09.003

Cancer Treatment Reviews
Volume 36, Issue 1 , Pages 24-32, February 2010