Cancer Treatment Reviews
Volume 36, Issue 2 , Pages 91-100, April 2010

Management of prostate cancer recurrence after definitive radiation therapy

  • Christian Boukaram

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Therapy, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, 5415 Bd de l’Assomption, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H1T 2M4
    • Department of Radiation Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, 33, Avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice Cedex, France
  • ,
  • Jean-Michel Hannoun-Levi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, 33, Avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice Cedex, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +33 492 031 271; fax: +33 492 031 570.

Received 3 April 2009; received in revised form 8 June 2009; accepted 21 June 2009. published online 25 January 2010.

Summary 

The management of prostate cancer (PC) recurrence after definitive radiation therapy (RT) is shifting and there is no consensus regarding the optimal strategy. The major challenge is determining the anatomical site of relapse. In case of biochemical relapse (BR), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a non-curative option commonly used, while patients with a local PC recurrence could be managed through a curative intent. Based on a Pubmed data search, this manuscript focused on the management of post-RT local PC recurrences. In case of BR (nadir+2ng/ml), classical imaging work-up is not contributive for PSA levels <10ng/ml while new imaging investigations (diffusion MRI, 11C-choline PET) are more sensitive to detect local and distant recurrences at lower PSA levels. Positive prostate biopsies are the only method for confirming local recurrence, although this technique presents limitations. Primary PC presentation as well as PSA-related features (interval to failure, PSA kinetic) and patient features (life expectancy, urinary, sexual status) are important to consider. Results of curative salvage options (radical prostatectomy, cryotherapy, brachytherapy and high-intensity focused ultrasound-HIFU) are analyzed and discussed. Each of these therapies appears feasible and has its own set of experience and toxicity profile. Other therapeutic options (photodynamic therapy, ADT, observation) are discussed. Longer follow-up and mature series are needed to evaluate the optimal strategy and prospective trials are warranted. Each clinical situation should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting. Different options should be explained to the patient and decision should be taken after balancing treatment outcomes with life expectancy.

Keywords: Prostate Cancer, Radiation therapy, Recurrence, Salvage, Prostatectomy, HIFU, Cryotherapy, Brachytherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0305-7372(09)00092-9

doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.06.006

Cancer Treatment Reviews
Volume 36, Issue 2 , Pages 91-100, April 2010