Cancer Treatment Reviews
Volume 31, Supplement 2 , Pages S10-S16, 2005

Fulvestrant (‘Faslodex’): Clinical experience from the Compassionate Use Programme

  • Guenther G. Steger

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, 18-20 Währinger Gürtel, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +43 140 400 5466; fax: +43 140 400 6081.
  • ,
  • Maya Gips

      Affiliations

    • Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
  • ,
  • Sergio D. Simon

      Affiliations

    • Hospital Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • Ana Lluch

      Affiliations

    • Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  • ,
  • Jefferson Vinholes

      Affiliations

    • Santa Casa Hospital, Porto Alegre, Brazil
  • ,
  • Bella Kaufman

      Affiliations

    • The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
  • ,
  • Andrew Wardley

      Affiliations

    • Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
  • ,
  • Louis Mauriac

      Affiliations

    • Institut Bergonié, Centre Régional de Lutte Contre le Cancer de Bordeaux et du Sud-Ouest, Bordeaux, France

published online 04 October 2005.

Summary 

Fulvestrant (‘Faslodex’) is a new oestrogen receptor (ER) antagonist with no agonist effects that is licensed in the USA, Brazil, Europe and elsewhere for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) in postmenopausal women following progression on other endocrine agents. This report consolidates clinical experience from the ‘Faslodex’ Compassionate Use Programme, including a total of 339 patients treated at eight cancer centres. Patients received fulvestrant as first- (n=22), second- (n=125), third- (n=105), fourth- (n=58), fifth- (n=22) or sixth-line (n=5) hormonal treatment for ABC, with two patients receiving fulvestrant after more than six other endocrine therapies. Objective response was achieved by 40 patients and stable disease lasting ⩾6 months by 92 patients, giving overall clinical benefit (CB) in 132/339 patients (39%). The CB rate decreased as fulvestrant was used later in the sequence of endocrine treatments, from 46% (10/22) with first-line fulvestrant to 27% (6/22) with fifth-line fulvestrant. Increased benefit was found in patients with tumours expressing both ER and progesterone receptor (PgR) compared with other combinations, although good activity was reported in patients expressing either ER or PgR as well as in tumours expressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Fulvestrant was well tolerated; adverse events were noted in 18/339 patients (5%). These findings concur with data from the clinical-trial setting and further support the assertion that greater benefit is derived when fulvestrant is used early in the treatment sequence.

Keywords: ‘Faslodex’, Fulvestrant, Breast cancer, Metastatic, Tamoxifen, Aromatase inhibitors, Hormone-dependent neoplasms, Oestradiol antagonists, Selective oestrogen modulators

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0305-7372(05)00141-6

doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2005.08.009

Cancer Treatment Reviews
Volume 31, Supplement 2 , Pages S10-S16, 2005