Cancer Treatment Reviews
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 159-172, May 2005

The controversial abscopal effect

  • Joseph M. Kaminski

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
    • Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
    • Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
  • ,
  • Eric Shinohara

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
  • ,
  • James Bradley Summers

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of South Alabama, P.O. Box 16343, Mobile, AL 36616, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 251 639 3431; fax: +1 251 471 7882
  • ,
  • Kenneth J. Niermann

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
  • ,
  • Allan Morimoto

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Utah, USA
  • ,
  • Jeffrey Brousal

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

published online 31 May 2005.

Summary 

The abscopal effect is potentially important for tumor control and is mediated through cytokines and/or the immune system, mainly cell-mediated immunity. It results from loss of growth stimulatory and/or immunosuppressive factors from the tumor. Until recently, the abscopal effect referred to the distant effects seen after local radiation therapy. However, the term should now be used interchangeably with distant bystander effect. Through analysis of distant bystander effects of other local therapies, we discuss the poorly understood and researched radiation-induced abscopal effect. Although the abscopal effect has been described in various malignancies, it is a rarely recognized clinical event. The abscopal effect is still extremely controversial with known data that both support and refute the concept.

Keywords: Cancer, Distant bystander, Surgery, Radiation, Immune system

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0305-7372(05)00054-X

doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2005.03.004

Cancer Treatment Reviews
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 159-172, May 2005